The Language of Male Supremacy in She and The Sign of Four Essay

The Language of Male success in She and The Sign of Four These days we use up to be passing cargonful when we write or speak. In fact, at times it seems as if we must communicate as if tip toeing through a veritable(prenominal) minefield of the dangerous misinterpretations of our words. Since many words and phrases can be construed or misconstrued as offensive, in that location is a heightened sensitivity to the use of language. This is non necessarily a bad thing. We surely need to live in serviceman race where all(prenominal) people are treated with dignity and respect, and our use of language should ruminate this ideal. Most of us would not intentionally offend a psyche from a different race, culture, or creed, and the problem today is that there is such a subsurface tension that rage occasionally erupts all over anything that even remotely resembles the offensive. Where does this social extremism that condemns even ambiguous nominatements come from? Thin gs were not always this way. If we were to look deeper into the history of the English language, we would typically find inelegant words and phrases that debased women and members of other cultures. These expressions may not necessarily have been malicious in spirit in all instances, but they were certainly demeaning and ranged from the subtle to the intentional. Certainly, some of the phrases that were commonly printed then would be socially unacceptable to print today. For example, any representative sample of late straight-laced literature will reveal misogynistic and racist remarks by contemporary standards. In fairness to the Victorians, the world was going through a rapid state of change then, and England was leading the way. Part of the motivation behind the imperialistic ende... ...winism dramatically changed the way many people thought then, our modern ideas of cultural mixture and gender egalitarianism have changed the way many people presuppose today. Our modern language clearly reflects this change. We have come a want way in disregarding boldly offensive descriptions, to questioning the properness of statements such as You people. Some people have eager ears that are always ready to latch onto the next faux pas and have clinch fists that are ready to gaff their next victim. Therefore, a masked tension remains, but on a lighter note, the positive force that guides our present evolving world in which we are conscientiously laboring to temper our language with human dignity balances this tension. Yet, our language can only be truly self-respectful to the degree to which it preserves the dignity of all of whom it dares to describe.