.

Friday, January 25, 2019

Case Memo as a hired consultant Essay

In this assignment, students leave alone read and analyze a sequel study. In response to the bailiwick study, students will write an analysis in short letter memo format, turn to to the Board of Directors for the company. The memo is written by the student acting as a hired consultant for the company.The case study to be analyzed, The outcome of Plant Relocation, is attached.By completing this assignment, students will meet the outcome(s)identify honorable issues that arise in domestic and global business environments using an concord of estimable concepts and of legal and business principles develop and evaluate options to, and recommend effects for, good quandarys, taking into account ethical and legal requirements and the essential mission of the business enterprise effectively communicate to internal and external business stakeholders the complexities of ethical issues, suggesting and analyzing various solutions in order to ensure appropriate business practices and righteousness Requirements of Case Memo 2Draft memo using the enjoin format (subheadings/sections) prescribed below any sections must be comprehensive, in-depth and amply justified Resources from antecedently assigned course materials or from your own query may be utilise to justify and plunk for rationale All in-text citations and resources must be in APA styleSubmit the completed case in the Assignment Folder.Memorandum FormatTOFROMREDATE embroil all the following subheadings/sections in the memoINTRODUCTION Brief origination to subject of memo.FACTS SUMMARY Summarize and explain the facts that atomic sum up 18 directly world-shattering and relevant to the ethical dilemma in this case.ETHICAL DILEMMA discuss either/or ethical dilemma facing the company.ETHICAL ISSUES treat two (2) of the most significant ethical issues related to, and arising from, the ethical dilemma and then, explain severally ethical issue and why it is an ethical/ moralistic issue, etc.ALTERNATIV ES List, explain and justify one (1) possible resource/solution for EACH ethical issue to address and resolve the ethical dilemma and each ethical issue discussed above.Alternatives should be feasible, logical, directly related to solvent the ethical dilemma and addressing the ethical issues in the case.Alternatives ar expressed in the form of propositions or prescriptive statements suggesting action and be framed by asking the normative question, what could or should the company do? Consider consequences. see relevant stakeholders and the effects on them, pros and cons, etc. of each alternative. Apply ethical theories in context of your evaluations, but dont over-do this aspect. For example, teleological or consequentialist theorists would examine who the stakeholders ar, both internal and external to the company, and the positive and negative consequences for each group, etc.RECOMMENDATION Recommend one and only one (1) alternative from the two (2) alternatives suggested abo ve. Justify and explain your choice discussingwhy you recommend this alternativehow, specifically, the passport will address the ethical dilemma and ethical issues how the good word will likely impact relevant stakeholders pros and cons of your recommendationfeasibility of your recommendationhow the recommendation will be implementedApply ethical theories, resources from previously assigned course materials, or resources from your own research to justify and support your recommendation.FUTURE IMPLICATIONS for RECOMMENDATION Discuss potential implications arising from your recommendation forthe company another(prenominal) businesses within the industryother industriesCONCLUSION Summarize the case and its ethical issues, implications, etc.The Case of the Plant RelocationYou are the chief administrator of Electrocorp, an electronics company, which makes the onboard computer components for automobiles. In your production plants, complex hydrocarbon solvents are used to smashing the c hips and other parts that go into the computer components. Some of the solvents used are carcinogens and must be handled with extreme care. Until recently, all of your production plants were located in the fall in States. However, the cost of production has risen, causing profits to decline.A number of factors support increased production costs. First, the union representing the workers in your plant waged a successful strike resulting in increased salary and benefits. The pay and benefits pile for beginning employees is around $15/hour. A second factor has been stiff safety regulations. These safety procedures, which apply inside the plant, have been expensive in both time and money. Finally, environmental regulationshave made Electrocorps trading operations more costly. Electrocorp is required to put its waste through an expensive care for before depositing it at a special disposal facility.Shareholders have been plain to you about the declining fortunes of the company. Man y of Electrocorps competitors have moved their operations to less-developed countries, where their run costs are less than in the United States, and you have begun to select whether to relocate a number of plants to offshore sites. Electrocorp is a major employer in each of the U.S. cities where it is located, and you know that a plant closure will pee-pee economic dislocation in these communities. You know that the employees who will be situated off because of plant closures will have difficulty finding homogeneous positions and that increased unemployment, with its attendant social costs, will result. However, you are aware of numerous other corporations, including your competitors, that have shut down their U.S. operations, and it is something that you are willing to consider.You have hired a consultant, Martha Smith, to investigate the sites for possible plant relocation. Ms. Smith has old age of experience working with companies that have moved their operations to less-d eveloped countries to reduce their in operation(p) costs. Based on your own research, you have asked Ms. Smith to more richly investigate the possibility of operations in Mexico, the Philippines, and mho Africa. A heavyset of her report and recommendation for each country followsMexicoA number of evade cities in Mexico would be cost-efficient relocation sites based on outwear and health and safety/environmental factors. Workers in production plants comparable to Electrocorps earn about $3 per day, which is the prevailing wage. There is frequent worker turnover because employees complain that they cannot live on $3/day, and they head due north to work illegally in the United States. However, a ready picture of workers takes their place.Mexican health and environmental laws are also favorable to production. motion picture to toxic chemicals in the workplace is permitted at gameer takes than in the United States, allowing corporations to dispense to some degree with costly procedures and equipment. Mexicos environmental laws are less strict than those of the United States, and a solvent recovery system, used to reduce the toxicity of the waste before dumping, is not required.The only diagnosable business risk is possible bad publicity. The rate of birth defects has been high in many Mexican border towns where similar plants are in operation. Citizen health groups have begun protests, accusing the companies of contamination leading to illness.PhilippinesConditions in the Philippines are more favorable than those in Mexico in terms of labor and health and safety/environmental factors.The prevailing wage in the Philippines is about $1/day, and young workers (under 16) may be paid even less. As in Mexico, the workers complain that the rate of pay is not a living wage, but it is the present market rate.The health and safety and environmental regulations are alike to those in Mexico, but on that point have been no public complaints or opposition regardin g birth defects, cancers, or other illnesses.South AfricaConditions in South Africa are positive in some respects, but not as favorable in economic terms as in Mexico or the Philippines. The prevailing wage in South Africa is about $10/day. Furthermore, there is a strong union movement, meaning that there may be future demands for increases in wages and benefits.The unions and the government have been working unitedly on health and safety issues and environmental protections. Exposure to toxic chemicals in the workplace is not permitted at as high a train as in Mexico and the Philippines. Although the equipment necessary to reduce toxic chemicals to an acceptable level is not as costly as in the United States, this write off would not be incurred in the other two countries. Furthermore, there are requirements for a solvent recovery system, which also increases operation expenses.You have to influence how you would like to proceed. Your options are to select an overseas site f or relocation or to simply continue all operations within the United States.

No comments:

Post a Comment