'Globalization of Technology Essay\r'

'Politics †engine room en competents and unconstipated arouses miscellanys in every aspect of our lives. finished the years it has changed what and how we eat (the micro shudder), how and where we work (the profit), how we atomic number 18 entertained, and even how we keep in touch with friends and family. And though untold people may notice these types of quick advances of applied science, numerous may not notice how technological advances bring tied into changes in regimen and the way they require been run. •The power of draw images has really become a major influence on politics as a product of a increasing technology. In the 1960’s, images of wealth in the west eventually clear the weakness of the communist regime running the hoar Soviet bloc. There is the story Nikita Khrushchev narrating a picture show of Harlem in the 1960’s to demonstrate poverty in America.\r\nInstead, his poor, struggling citizens foc apply on the nylons interru ption on backyard clothes lines and the number of fine autos in the street, and saw wealth rather than poverty. Today, the pictures from Iran appear in graphic detail on our televisions. The power of the mass media has made it much than difficult for the state to skirt off the right(prenominal) world. •The television has been used to promote politics through commercial advertisement since the Dwight D. Eisenhower running game in 1952. That was over 50 years ago. It has been used to broadcast presidential debates since the Kennedy vs Nixon Great Debate in 1960 which was exactly 50 years ago. However, nothing is resembling the way the television is used today.\r\n•The most novel Presidential campaign, in 2008, showed how fundraising is cosmos impacted. President Obama embossed a record breaking 600 million dollars in contri un littleions during his run up to the election. Of that 600 that Obama received, 500 million came from the internet and through public financ ing through the internet. He ran as fierce an internet campaign as he did his television and radio campaigns. Later the self aforementioned(prenominal)(prenominal) young people who followed Obama’s every strickle online, turned out to vote. •Is technology change politics?\r\n•For example, you plunder argue that because there are tons of overbolds channels. Campaigns are now much more media run. The media decides what is news worthy (which as of the sometime(prenominal) a few(prenominal) years has been whatever gets ratings), interprets the meaning of events for its viewers, and manipulates the decision fashioning process of its viewers. •Can technology be damaging to governmental candidates themselves? •Political videos of nearly every 2008 presidential candidates can be found on YouTube. In many of the stick on videos, candidates are engaged in old speeches, contradicting their current political positions. •Also, since the election, the internet seems to stick gone from President Obama’s best friend, to his superior political enemy. Some of the most controversial principle in US history is being introduced and posted online for all Americans to see, online commentators who once supported Obama are unceasingly pointing out unfilled promises.\r\nEconomy and Social traffic †Technological progress is the key to offering prox populations the potential for improved standards of living. Technical change enables firms to merge inputs in a novel manner to take in existing products more cheaply and to develop new products to meet consumer needs. Economists and early(a) social scientists pretty much agree that technological change is the most main(prenominal) contributor to economic egression in the youthful era and it is estimated that more than half of the country’s long-run growth is can be attributed to technological change. •A prime example of technology found increases in produc tivity comes from the field of agriculture.\r\nUntil at to the lowest degree the 17th century, most 90% of the population was flat involved in agriculture. In the United States, the rear population was 44% of the total population as recently as 1880. Currently, the U.S. conjure population is most 2% of the total population. But over that same period, total production from bring outs has more than doubled. The increase in productivity is correlated with several technological innovations in the field of farming. The innovations include the widespread use of farm chemicals (fertilizers, pesticides), and farming equipment. Thus, the tremendous increase in farm productivity is seen as a reckon closure of the technological advances that were made in the field. •Technological change in production processes like that often reduces the amount of money of labor and other resources needed to originate a unit of yield. This is good on one clear because it reduces the cost of p roduction for products but on the other, it in any case results in a loss of jobs in the short-run.\r\nThe long-run is a different story though. By simplification the cost of production you thereby are displace the price of a particular good in a competitive market, which then frequently leads to a greater demand for that good. And a greater output demand results in increased production, which requires more labor, and offsets the do of losing jobs in the short-run. •Along with production technology, constant improvements of transportation and communications technologies have as well as had major impacts on today’s economy. Previously, physical and human resources locomote nigh the world by means of land, sea, and channelise transportation. Now, with data serving as a underlying resource and digital communications the means of transport, financial capital is moving throughout the world at nearly the renovate of light. •How has technology negatively chan ge the economy?\r\n•One challenge that technology has brought about to the new global economy comes from the new wave of outsourcing. As a concept it’s not new. Companies have chased cheap labor around the globe for decades, making cars in Mexico, plastic toys in Taiwan and shirts in Malaysia. But in the past couple of years, the debate over outsourcing has intensified as technology companies reduce costs by direct technical support, software development, quality assurance and other functions offshore. A few years ago this subject would have been impossible. The world mostly turned to its technology leaders, companies such as Microsoft Corp. for example, when it needed software. But with the growth of broadband Internet connections and e-mail, technical support lag and software developers can respond to questions with the same speed in Bangalore, India, as they do in Bellevue. And they can do it at a fraction of the cost.\r\n•Of way this comes at the expense o f not only dismay class and low skilled workers in the U.S., but even in the middle classes, there are plenty of jobs that are now outsourced.. Again, inability to follow work means inability to purchase homes, cut down money, and profit companies. When people don’t buy, corporations that produce things don’t make money, which can therefore â€Å"trickle down” to fewer jobs available and a greater desire to outsource to make things more cheaply so they leave be more attractive to consumers. •Those supporting outsourcing say that lowering expenses of corporations willing create jobs. There are plenty of government agencies that outsource some of their work, providence them millions of dollars, a direct effect on the US economy and on federal spending.\r\nA common theory contends that being able to net people lower take for work means that companies will be able to produce things with less expense and transfer this saving to consumers. Lower prices may mean more consumer spending, and companies will be able to hire more workers in the US because they’re paying less for workers outside of it. •Further, many argue that giving jobs to workers in less developed countries improves those countries economically and increases trade for US products. It also increases a country’s ability to pay back debts to the US, and may promote better political relationships. Companies economically benefit by selling their products in other countries. This means they can hire more people in the US and lower their prices on products for US consumers.\r\n'