Philosophy

In The Morality of Happiness , Annas explains that morality in antediluvian patriarch times was non socially imposed hardly one by one derived as a consequence of person-to-person considerateness near an unfilled purpose-driven life (Annas 27 She uses Aristotelian h wizardst to gasconade up this involve . This will guide , not palisade but explain Annas s representation of Aristotle s of ethical motive . Every view of Aristotle that is presented in the body of this essay is Annas s view of Aristotle Assuming that Annas is remedy in her explanation of Aristotle , the concluding paragraphs of this essay will before long address some of the implications of Aristotle s ethicsAccording to Aristotle , honourable considerations be not for all(prenominal) ace ethical motive begins as a quest for a better life . Tho se who ar satisfied with their lives or neediness the ability to resound on their lives apprisenot drive in the considerateness that is necessary for value . spring chicken masses cannot deal in ethics because they take over lived enormous enough to be able to reflect on their accomplishments . too , plenty who are so busy with their lives or do not prevail the opportunity for leisure cannot ingest in ethics because they do not have the time that is inevitable for mirror image . Ethics is not for such people . For people to practice or withdraw in ethical activeness , tierce things must(prenominal) occur . First , people should be disgruntled with their lives . This may seem a rather singular way to assure at ethics , but those who are satisfied with their lives cannot contain in ethics , at least not in the sense of ancient ethics secondly , dissatisfied people must require to improve their conditions disgruntled people can not be complacent most their situations if they are to engage in what pa! sses for ethical activities . Thirdly dissatisfied people should reflect on ways of living that may be considered improvement over their present conditions . Their reflections should be apt in to fling for ethical .

Only individuals who fulfill these three criteria can engage in and benefit from the objective of ethical . Ethical would have no force for people who do not engage in such reflection on a personal level (Annas , p29The purpose of ethical reflection is not to exactly know what to do Ancient ethics is not to the highest breaker point knowing what to do . It is more about acting on knowing what to d o . The teleos (end ) or ending of ethical reflection is to act sensiblely upon what is known from the reflection . In Aristotelian ethics , it would not be ethical to act on feelings - desires or emotions - without reason . To do so would not be ethical More importantly , the quick of scent reflection must not be just for any(prenominal) objective it must be state at achieving the teleos of one s lifeSo , in Aristotle s view , there is a way that one goes about implementing this knowledge obtained from self-directed rational reflection . The implementation must be based on deliberate choices or actions Deliberate acting is necessary because it is the precisely kind of human...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper